On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:50:02PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 06:57:28PM +0800, Tianyu Lan wrote: > > > > "There is no x86 SEV SNP feature(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP) flag > > I'm sure we can arrange such a feature if we need it, this isn't rocket > science. Boris? https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230612042559.375660-7-michael.roth@xxxxxxx > This seems to work; it's a bit magical for having a nested ALTERNATIVE > but the output seems correct (the outer alternative comes last in > .altinstructions and thus has precedence). Sure the [thunk_target] input > goes unsed in one of the alteratives, but who cares. I'd like to avoid the nested alternative if not really necessary. I.e., a static_call should work here too no? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
