> From: Petr Tesařík <petr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 10:51 PM > > ... > > Argh, you're right. This is a braino. The alignment mask is in fact an > > INVERTED mask, i.e. it masks off bits that are not relevant for the > > alignment. The more strict alignment needed the more bits must be set, > > so the individual alignment constraints must be combined with an OR > > instead of an AND. > > > > Can you apply the following change and check if it fixes the issue? > > Actually, this will not work either. The mask is used to mask off both It works for me. > high address bits and low address bits (below swiotlb slot granularity). > > What should help is this: > ... This also works for me. Thanks, *either* version can resolve the issue for me :-)
