RE: [PATCH v2] x86/hyperv: Mark hv_ghcb_terminate() as noreturn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 2:24 PM
> 
> On 10/03/2023 18:17, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> > [...]
> > Just curious:  Should the actual function also be updated with
> > __noreturn?   In similar situations, such as snp_abort(), the
> > __noreturn attribute is both places.   I don't know what the
> > guidance is on this question.
> >
> 
> Hi Michael / Josh (and all), lemme know if you want me to submit a V3
> doing that. The function is not called inside this own definition file
> nor exported, so I'm not sure that'd be necessary, but glad to do so if
> you prefer.
> 

I don't have a preference.  I was just trying to make sure the details
are all correct.  I'll defer to those with more knowledge of the
__noreturn attribute than I have.

Michael




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux