From: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 2:24 PM > > On 10/03/2023 18:17, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote: > > [...] > > Just curious: Should the actual function also be updated with > > __noreturn? In similar situations, such as snp_abort(), the > > __noreturn attribute is both places. I don't know what the > > guidance is on this question. > > > > Hi Michael / Josh (and all), lemme know if you want me to submit a V3 > doing that. The function is not called inside this own definition file > nor exported, so I'm not sure that'd be necessary, but glad to do so if > you prefer. > I don't have a preference. I was just trying to make sure the details are all correct. I'll defer to those with more knowledge of the __noreturn attribute than I have. Michael
