On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:48:06PM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 11:33 AM
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:01:25PM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> > > Unless there are objections, I'll go with CC_ATTR_PARAVISOR_DEVICES,
> >
> > What does "DEVICES" mean in this context?
> >
> > You need to think about !virt people too who are already confused by the
> > word "paravisor". :-)
> >
>
> Maybe I misunderstood your previous comment about "Either 1". We can
> avoid "PARAVISOR" entirely by going with two attributes:
No, I'm fine with CC_ATTR_PARAVISOR. Why would you have to have
CC_ATTR_PARAVISOR_DEVICES? I.e., the string "_DEVICES" appended after
"PARAVISOR". Isn't CC_ATTR_PARAVISOR enough?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
