On 01/02/2023 02:57, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:54:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 31/01/2023 19:10, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>> + - |
>>> + / {
>>> + compatible = "foo";
>>> + model = "foo";
>>> + #address-cells = <0x02>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0x02>;
>>
>> Except previous comments (all of them were ignored),
>
> Thank you for your comments, I have tried to address them all in this version
> but I may have missed few. I will go and look again all the emails, but if
> there is any thing which you can point again and we can start a new dicussion
> from here will be very helpful.
>
> I think one concern was related to use of 'reg' or 'ranges', and I
> thought this patch will give clarity that I intend to use 'ranges'
> without any child node. Is this acceptable ?
There were several comments.
>
>
>> also:
>> Drop entire part. Not related, not correct, not helping and you cannot
>> have top level nodes in example.
>
> If I dont use the top level node, the parent address cells are assumed to be 1,
> and I get below warning. If there is better way to address this warning, please
> suggest I will work on it.
>
> Warning (ranges_format): /example-0/vmbus@ff0000000:ranges: "ranges" property has invalid length (20 bytes) (parent #address-cells == 1, child #address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1)
Then use soc just like every other example.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
