> From: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, January 6, 2023 2:11 AM > To: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [...] > I guess we both agree that memory conversion in HV should be done through > coco so the hv_map_memory can be removed (even the extra does not hurt > currently) Correct. As I mentioned, Michael's pachset is doing that and hopefully it would be merged into the upstream soon. > The memory conversion in current HV code is done by different approaches. > Some are going through the coco, some are not, which ends up > with if(hv_isolation_type_snp()) in memory allocation path. It can be > confusing. I suppose a reasonable purpose of hv_isolation_type_snp() > should cover the AMD SEV-SNP specific parts which haven't been (or are > not going to be) covered by coco. For example the GHCB stuff. > > Thanks, > Zhi. Exactly.
