On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:41:29AM -0800, Michael Kelley wrote:
> Fix this by moving mem_encrypt_init() after late_time_init() and
> related clock initializations. The intervening initializations don't
> do any I/O that requires the swiotlb, so moving mem_encrypt_init()
> slightly later has no impact.
I hope you're right. Our boot ordering is fragile as hell. But
mem_encrypt_init() doesn't do a whole lot of important setup - that has
happened a lot earlier already - so I'm not too worried.
But we'll see what breaks in wider testing.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
