RE: [PATCH] x86/Hyper-V: Expand definition of struct hv_vp_assist_page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Anirudh Rayabharam <anrayabh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 12:17 AM
> 
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 09:56:54PM -0700, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> > The struct hv_vp_assist_page has 24 bytes which is defined as u64[3],
> > expand that to expose vtl_entry_reason, vtl_ret_x64rax and vtl_ret_x64rcx
> > field. vtl_entry_reason is updated by hypervisor for the entry reason as
> > to why the VTL was entered on the virtual processor.
> > Guest updates the vtl_ret_* fields to provide the register values to
> > restore on VTL return. The specific register values that are restored
> > which will be updated on vtl_ret_x64rax and vtl_ret_x64rcx.
> > Also added the missing fields for synthetic_time_unhalted_timer_expired,
> > virtualization_fault_information and intercept_message.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-
> tlfs.h
> > index f769b9db4630..b3d0f42853d2 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> > @@ -377,11 +377,20 @@ struct hv_nested_enlightenments_control {
> >  struct hv_vp_assist_page {
> >  	__u32 apic_assist;
> >  	__u32 reserved1;
> > -	__u64 vtl_control[3];
> > +	__u8  vtl_entry_reason;
> 
> This is defined as an enum in the TLFS [1]. We should do the same.
> And since the TLFS defines it as an enum it is a 32 bit value and
> not a u8.

In the *tlfs.h files we have avoided defining fields with type "enum"
because of the potential for variability in number of bytes it occupies. 
The TLFS documentation assumes an enum is 4 bytes, so in these
structure definitions we use a __u32 type to be explicit about the size.

We do have enum types defined in the *tlfs.h files, but these are just
lists of related constant values, and that's OK.

Michael

> 
> > +	__u8  vtl_reserved[7];
> > +	__u64 vtl_ret_x64rax;
> > +	__u64 vtl_ret_x64rcx;
> 
> The TLFS groups the above VTL related fields into a struct
> HV_VP_VTL_CONTROL. Any reason to not do the same?
> 
> [1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/tlfs/datatypes/hv_vp_vtl_control
> 
> Thanks,
> Anirudh.
> 
> >  	struct hv_nested_enlightenments_control nested_control;
> >  	__u8 enlighten_vmentry;
> >  	__u8 reserved2[7];
> >  	__u64 current_nested_vmcs;
> > +	__u8 synthetic_time_unhalted_timer_expired;
> > +	__u8 reserved3[7];
> > +	__u8 virtualization_fault_information[40];
> > +	__u8 reserved4[8];
> > +	__u8 intercept_message[256];
> > +	__u8 vtl_ret_actions[256];
> >  } __packed;
> >
> >  struct hv_enlightened_vmcs {
> > --
> > 2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux