The only unsupported primary processor-based VM-execution control at the
moment is CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_TERTIARY_CONTROLS and KVM doesn't expose it
in nested VMX feature MSRs anyway (see nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs())
but in preparation to inverting "unsupported with eVMCS" checks (and
for completeness) it's better to sanitize MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS/
MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PROCBASED_CTLS too.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
index d8b23c96d627..337783675731 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
@@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ enum evmcs_revision {
enum evmcs_ctrl_type {
EVMCS_EXIT_CTRLS,
EVMCS_ENTRY_CTRLS,
+ EVMCS_EXEC_CTRL,
EVMCS_2NDEXEC,
EVMCS_PINCTRL,
EVMCS_VMFUNC,
@@ -381,6 +382,9 @@ static const u32 evmcs_unsupported_ctrls[NR_EVMCS_CTRLS][NR_EVMCS_REVISIONS] = {
[EVMCS_ENTRY_CTRLS] = {
[EVMCSv1_LEGACY] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL,
},
+ [EVMCS_EXEC_CTRL] = {
+ [EVMCSv1_LEGACY] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_EXEC_CTRL,
+ },
[EVMCS_2NDEXEC] = {
[EVMCSv1_LEGACY] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC,
},
@@ -441,6 +445,10 @@ void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 *
unsupported_ctrls |= VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
ctl_high &= ~unsupported_ctrls;
break;
+ case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS:
+ case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PROCBASED_CTLS:
+ ctl_high &= ~evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(EVMCS_EXEC_CTRL);
+ break;
case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2:
ctl_high &= ~evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(EVMCS_2NDEXEC);
break;
@@ -468,6 +476,10 @@ int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
vmcs12->pin_based_vm_exec_control)))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (CC(!nested_evmcs_is_valid_controls(EVMCS_EXEC_CTRL,
+ vmcs12->cpu_based_vm_exec_control)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (CC(!nested_evmcs_is_valid_controls(EVMCS_2NDEXEC,
vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control)))
return -EINVAL;
--
2.38.1
