On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 09:15:15PM -0700, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:54:07PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:52:05PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 04:56:46AM -0700, Saurabh Sengar wrote: > > > > This patch enables support for slower vmbus channels, which consist > > > > of following 3 changes : > > > > 1. Support for hypercalls > > > > 2. Module params for recv/send buffer sizes > > > > 3. Module param for custom ring buffer sizes > > > > > > Even if this all was ok, you are doing 3 things all in one change, > > > that's not allowed at all, you all know this. > > > > > > Anyway, no new module parameters, this is not the 1990's, we have much > > > better ways to do this properly (hint, module parameters modify code, > > > you want to modify the options of a specific device.) > > > > Also, you give no good reason for why this is needed at all, nor how > > anyone would use these options and why they would need to. > > > > The kernel should "just work" and not require manual intervention by a > > user. Dynamically fix this based on the device, do NOT force a user to > > have to attempt to "tune" anything, that will never work properly over > > time, AND you are being lazy and forcing each individual user to do the > > work, making more effort needed overall than just doing it properly in > > the kernel. > > Let me find a method if we can avoid using module parameters, this may result > in hardcoding values in the vmbus driver code for various devices, giving less > flexibilty to user. A user should not be using the uio driver for any of that, so I doubt this is a real issue :) thanks, greg k-h