On 23.08.2022 23:57, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 16:30 -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:18:52PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:14:10 -0400 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>>> Stefano will be online again on Monday. I suggest we wait for him to >>>> review this series. If it's urgent, please let me know and I'll take a >>>> look. Hi, sure, nothing urgent, no problem. Let's wait for Stefano! Is there something wrong with this patchset? I've replaced RFC -> net-next since Stefano reviewed all patches except 0001 and suggested to use net-next in v4. >>> >>> It was already applied, sorry about that. But please continue with >>> review as if it wasn't. We'll just revert based on Stefano's feedback >>> as needed. >> >> Okay, no problem. > > For the records, I applied the series since it looked to me Arseniy > addressed all the feedback from Stefano on the first patch (the only > one still lacking an acked-by/reviewed-by tag) and I thought it would > be better avoiding such delay. Yes, only 0001 lacks reviewed-by > > We are still early in this net-next cycle, I think it can be improved > incrementally as needed. > > Paolo > Thank You, Arseniy
