On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 01:59:02PM +0000, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Kelley (LINUX) <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 9:51 AM
> > To: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; KY Srinivasan
> > <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Stephen
> > Hemminger <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx; Dexuan Cui
> > <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Add cpu read lock
> >
> > From: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, June
> > 8, 2022 10:27 PM
> > >
> > > Add cpus_read_lock to prevent CPUs from going offline between query and
> > > actual use of cpumask. cpumask_of_node is first queried, and based on it
> > > used later, in case any CPU goes offline between these two events, it can
> > > potentially cause an infinite loop of retries.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> > > index 85a2142..6a88b7e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> > > @@ -749,6 +749,9 @@ static void init_vp_index(struct vmbus_channel
> > *channel)
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /* No CPUs should come up or down during this. */
> > > + cpus_read_lock();
> > > +
> > > for (i = 1; i <= ncpu + 1; i++) {
> > > while (true) {
> > > numa_node = next_numa_node_id++;
> > > @@ -781,6 +784,7 @@ static void init_vp_index(struct vmbus_channel
> > *channel)
> > > break;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + cpus_read_unlock();
> > > channel->target_cpu = target_cpu;
> > >
> > > free_cpumask_var(available_mask);
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> >
> > This patch was motivated because I suggested a potential issue here during
> > a separate conversation with Saurabh, but it turns out I was wrong. :-(
> >
> > init_vp_index() is only called from vmbus_process_offer(), and the
> > cpus_read_lock() is already held when init_vp_index() is called. So the
> > issue doesn't exist, and this patch isn't needed.
> >
> > However, looking at vmbus_process_offer(), there appears to be a
> > different problem in that cpus_read_unlock() is not called when taking
> > the error return because the sub_channel_index is zero.
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
> } else {
> /*
> * Check to see if this is a valid sub-channel.
> */
> if (newchannel->offermsg.offer.sub_channel_index == 0) {
> mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
> /*
> * Don't call free_channel(), because newchannel->kobj
> * is not initialized yet.
> */
> kfree(newchannel);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> return;
> }
>
> If this happens, it should be a host bug. Yes, I also think the cpus_read_unlock()
> is missing in this error path.
>
> Thanks,
> - Haiyang
I see, will send another patch to fix this.
Regards,
Saurabh
