On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 05:23:31PM +0800, Tianyu Lan wrote: >> >> - the bare memremap usage in swiotlb looks strange and I'd >> definitively expect a well documented wrapper. > > OK. Should the wrapper in the DMA code? How about dma_map_decrypted() > introduced in the V4? A mentioned then the name is a pretty bad choice as it touches the dma_map* namespace that it is not related to. I suspect just a little helper in the swiotlb code that explains how it is used might be enogh for now.
