Hi Dave:
Thanks for your review.
On 7/8/2021 12:14 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 7/7/21 8:46 AM, Tianyu Lan wrote:
@@ -598,7 +599,7 @@ void arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres(void)
*/
int arch_kexec_post_alloc_pages(void *vaddr, unsigned int pages, gfp_t gfp)
{
- if (sev_active())
+ if (sev_active() || hv_is_isolation_supported())
return 0;
/*
@@ -611,7 +612,7 @@ int arch_kexec_post_alloc_pages(void *vaddr, unsigned int pages, gfp_t gfp)
void arch_kexec_pre_free_pages(void *vaddr, unsigned int pages)
{
- if (sev_active())
+ if (sev_active() || hv_is_isolation_supported())
return;
You might want to take a look through the "protected guest" patches. I
think this series is touching a few of the same locations that TDX and
recent SEV work touch.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210618225755.662725-5-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Thanks for reminder. You are right. There will be a generic API to check
"proteced guest" type.
