Hi Dexuan,
Thanks for the feedback.
You are right saying ‘mana_hwc_destroy_wq' free’s up the queue.
However for example if function 'mana_hwc_alloc_dma_buf' fails it will goto ‘out' and call ‘mana_hwc_destroy_wq', the value 'hwc_wq->gdma_wq' is still not assigned at this point. In the ‘mana_hwc_destroy_wq' function i see it checks for 'hwc_wq->gdma_wq' before calling, ‘mana_gd_destroy_queue', which makes me think queue is still not freed.
Please let me know if i am missing something.
Regards,
/Dhiraj
> On 10 Jun 2021, at 18:28, Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> From: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 10:18 AM
>> ...
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
>>> index 1a923fd99990..4aa4bda518fb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
>>> @@ -501,8 +501,10 @@ static int mana_hwc_create_wq(struct
>>> hw_channel_context *hwc,
>>> *hwc_wq_ptr = hwc_wq;
>>> return 0;
>>> out:
>>> - if (err)
>>> + if (err) {
>>
>> Here the 'err' must be non-zero. Can you please remove this 'if'?
>>
>>> + kfree(queue);
>>> mana_hwc_destroy_wq(hwc, hwc_wq);
>>> + }
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi Dhiraj,
> I checked the code again and it looks like your patch is actually
> unnecessary as IMO there is no memory leak here: the 'queue'
> pointer is passed to mana_hwc_destroy_wq() as hwc_wq->gdma_wq,
> and is later freed in mana_gd_destroy_queue() ->
> mana_gd_destroy_queue().
>
> The 'if' test can be removed as the 'err's is always non-zero there.
>
> Thanks,
> Dexuan
