Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] mm: rename and move page_is_poisoned()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 5 May 2021 15:45:47 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed 05-05-21 15:39:08, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > > Long story short, this should be good enough for the cases we actually can
> > > > handle? What am I missing?  
> > > 
> > > I am not sure I follow. My point is that I fail to see any added value
> > > of the check as it doesn't prevent the race (it fundamentally cannot as
> > > the page can be poisoned at any time) but the failure path doesn't
> > > put_page which is incorrect even for hwpoison pages.  
> > 
> > Oh, I think you are right. If we have a page and return NULL we would leak a
> > reference.
> > 
> > Actually, we discussed in that thread handling this entirely differently,
> > which resulted in a v7 [1]; however Andrew moved forward with this
> > (outdated?) patch, maybe that was just a mistake?
> > 
> > Yes, I agree we should revert that patch for now.  
> 
> OK, Let me send the revert to Andrew.
> 

Got this!
Anyway, I will try to post a new patch for this issue based on the previous patch v7.

Thanks!
Aili Yao



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux