On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:49:41AM -0400, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> From: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> UIO HV driver should not load in the isolation VM for security reason.
> Return ENOTSUPP in the hv_uio_probe() in the isolation VM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c b/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c
> index 0330ba99730e..678b021d66f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/hyperv.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <asm/mshyperv.h>
>
> #include "../hv/hyperv_vmbus.h"
>
> @@ -241,6 +242,10 @@ hv_uio_probe(struct hv_device *dev,
> void *ring_buffer;
> int ret;
>
> + /* UIO driver should not be loaded in the isolation VM.*/
> + if (hv_is_isolation_supported())
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> /* Communicating with host has to be via shared memory not hypercall */
> if (!channel->offermsg.monitor_allocated) {
> dev_err(&dev->device, "vmbus channel requires hypercall\n");
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Again you send out known-wrong patches?
:(
