Re: [PATCH v2] tools/hv: async name resolution in kvp_daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:41:44 +0100
schrieb Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>:

> FullyQualifiedDomainName

I think in the past I did asked MSFT what the host side really expects. Maybe this time there will be an answer.

Why would the host expect a FQDN from a VM? Why would it care about DNS layout of the network within the VM?

Basically my copy of hv_kvp_daemon just sends `uname -n` to the host. This is more correct. This does not waste any network resources. This, up to now, led to no complains.

So, what is the purpose of this API?


Olaf

Attachment: pgpGo7pIo4HAe.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux