On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 05:31:50PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> These Hyper-V changes are problematic as we want to keep hyperv_timer.c
> architecture independent. While only the code for x86/x64 is currently
> accepted upstream, code for ARM64 support is in progress. So we need
> to use hv_setup_sched_clock() in hyperv_timer.c, and have the per-arch
> implementation in mshyperv.h.
Why, because ARM doesn't have static_call yet? I hear someone is working
on that...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
