On 07/10/20 10:59, David Woodhouse wrote: > Yeah, I was expecting the per-irqdomain affinity support to take a few > iterations. But this part, still sticking with the current behaviour of > only allowing CPUs to come online at all if they can be reached by all > interrupts, can probably go in first. > > It's presumably (hopefully!) a blocker for the qemu patch which exposes > the same feature bit defined in this patch. Yeah, though we could split it further and get the documentation part in first. That would let the QEMU part go through. Paolo
