On Tue, Aug 25 2020 at 06:21, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 24.08.20 23:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> I still think it does the right thing depending on the place it is >> called from, but even if so, it's completely unreadable gunk. I'll fix >> that proper. > > The main issue is that xen_initial_domain() and xen_pv_domain() are > orthogonal to each other. So xen_initial_domain() can either be true > for xen_pv_domain() (the "classic" pv dom0) or for xen_hvm_domain() > (the new PVH dom0). Fair enough. My limited XENology striked again.
