> > > > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> > > This looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Are you planning to push this, or do you want me to take it? If you > want me to take it, what is the urgency? Thanks. Well, not hurry, as long as it goes into 5.9 with all other changes. > > -corey > > > --- > > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 13 ++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c > > index 737c0b6b24ea..e1814b6a1225 100644 > > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c > > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c > > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ > > > > static struct ipmi_recv_msg *ipmi_alloc_recv_msg(void); > > static int ipmi_init_msghandler(void); > > -static void smi_recv_tasklet(unsigned long); > > +static void smi_recv_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t); > > static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf); > > static void need_waiter(struct ipmi_smi *intf); > > static int handle_one_recv_msg(struct ipmi_smi *intf, > > @@ -3430,9 +3430,8 @@ int ipmi_add_smi(struct module *owner, > > intf->curr_seq = 0; > > spin_lock_init(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock); > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs); > > - tasklet_init(&intf->recv_tasklet, > > - smi_recv_tasklet, > > - (unsigned long) intf); > > + tasklet_setup(&intf->recv_tasklet, > > + smi_recv_tasklet); > > atomic_set(&intf->watchdog_pretimeouts_to_deliver, 0); > > spin_lock_init(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock); > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->xmit_msgs); > > @@ -4467,10 +4466,10 @@ static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf) > > } > > } > > > > -static void smi_recv_tasklet(unsigned long val) > > +static void smi_recv_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t) > > { > > unsigned long flags = 0; /* keep us warning-free. */ > > - struct ipmi_smi *intf = (struct ipmi_smi *) val; > > + struct ipmi_smi *intf = from_tasklet(intf, t, recv_tasklet); > > int run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion; > > struct ipmi_smi_msg *newmsg = NULL; > > > > @@ -4542,7 +4541,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(struct ipmi_smi *intf, > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags); > > > > if (run_to_completion) > > - smi_recv_tasklet((unsigned long) intf); > > + smi_recv_tasklet(&intf->recv_tasklet); > > else > > tasklet_schedule(&intf->recv_tasklet); > > } > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > -- - Allen