On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 03:39:54PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 06:46:34PM +0200, Andrea Parri (Microsoft) wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I went back to my "cleanup list" recently and I wrote these patches: > > here you can find, among other things, > > > > 1) the removal of the fields 'target_vp' and 'numa_node' from the > > channel data structure, as suggested by Michael back in May; > > > > 2) various cleanups for channel->lock, which is actually *removed > > by the end of this series! ;-) > > > > I'm sure there is room for further "cleanups", ;-) but let me check > > if these (relatively small) changes make sense first... > > > > Thanks, > > Andrea > > > > Andrea Parri (Microsoft) (8): > > Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove the target_vp field from the vmbus_channel > > struct > > Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove the numa_node field from the vmbus_channel > > struct > > Drivers: hv: vmbus: Replace cpumask_test_cpu(, cpu_online_mask) with > > cpu_online() > > Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove unnecessary channel->lock critical sections > > (sc_list readers) > > Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use channel_mutex in channel_vp_mapping_show() > > Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove unnecessary channel->lock critical sections > > (sc_list updaters) > > scsi: storvsc: Introduce the per-storvsc_device spinlock > > Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove the lock field from the vmbus_channel > > struct > > I've queued these up to hyperv-next except for the scsi patch. > Andrea just pointed out that the last patch can't build without the scsi patch, so I've only applied only the first 6 patches for now. Wei. > Thanks, > Wei.
