The primitive currently uses channel->lock to protect the loop over
sc_list w.r.t. list additions/deletions but it doesn't protect the
target_cpu(s) loads w.r.t. a concurrent target_cpu_store(): while the
data races on target_cpu are hardly of any concern here, replace the
channel->lock critical section with a channel_mutex critical section
and extend the latter to include the loads of target_cpu; this same
pattern is also used in hv_synic_cleanup().
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
index b5ae45eb8aef7..9e39692dc13ee 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
@@ -507,18 +507,17 @@ static ssize_t channel_vp_mapping_show(struct device *dev,
{
struct hv_device *hv_dev = device_to_hv_device(dev);
struct vmbus_channel *channel = hv_dev->channel, *cur_sc;
- unsigned long flags;
int buf_size = PAGE_SIZE, n_written, tot_written;
struct list_head *cur;
if (!channel)
return -ENODEV;
+ mutex_lock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
+
tot_written = snprintf(buf, buf_size, "%u:%u\n",
channel->offermsg.child_relid, channel->target_cpu);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&channel->lock, flags);
-
list_for_each(cur, &channel->sc_list) {
if (tot_written >= buf_size - 1)
break;
@@ -532,7 +531,7 @@ static ssize_t channel_vp_mapping_show(struct device *dev,
tot_written += n_written;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&channel->lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
return tot_written;
}
--
2.25.1
