Re: [PATCH][next] drivers: hv: remove redundant assignment to pointer primary_channel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/04/2020 11:02, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We have this discussion over and over.  I always say it helps to have
> the commit mentioned in the commit message but it's not a Fixes tag.
> So I think that the commit message should say something like
> "commit 1234234 ("blah blah") removed some code so this variable isn't
> used any more".  I think it helps the review process.  But then if we
> mention the commit everyone says to use the Fixes tag.
> 
> It turns out if you leave out the commit entirely then people still
> complain but a lot less frequently.  It shouldn't work that way but
> reviewers are illogical.

Yep, to my knowledge the policy for this kind of commit is not described
in any documentation, so it's ambiguous. Either way, one can't win
without it being properly codified.

Colin

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux