RE: [PATCH 0/4] x86/Hyper-V: Panic code path fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 7:08 AM
> >>
> >> This patchset fixes some issues in the Hyper-V panic code path.
> >> Patch 1 resolves issue that panic system still responses network
> >> packets.
> >> Patch 2-3 resolves crash enlightenment issues.
> >> Patch 4 is to set crash_kexec_post_notifiers to true for Hyper-V
> >> VM in order to report crash data or kmsg to host before running
> >> kdump kernel.
> >
> > I still see an issue that isn't addressed by these patches.  The VMbus
> > driver registers a "die notifier" and a "panic notifier".   But die() will
> > eventually call panic() if panic_on_oops is set (which I think it typically
> > is).  If the CRASH_NOTIFY_MSG option is *not* enabled, then
> > hyperv_report_panic() could get called by the die notifier, and then
> > again by the panic notifier.
> >
> > Do we even need the "die notifier"?  If it was removed, there would
> > not be any notification to Hyper-V via the die() path unless panic_on_oops
> > is set, which I think is actually the correct behavior.  I'm not
> > completely clear on what is supposed to happen in general to the
> > Linux kernel if panic_on_oops is not set. Does it try to continue to run?
> > If so, then we should not be notifying Hyper-V if panic_on_oops is not
> > set, and removing the die notifier is the right thing to do.
> >
> 
> hyperv_report_panic() has re-enter check inside and so kernel only
> reports crash register data once during die().

Ah, yes, you are right.

> From comment in the
> hyperv_report_panic(), register value reported in die chain is more
> exact than value in panic chain. The register value in die chain is
> passed by die() caller. Register value reported in panic chain
> is collected in the hyperv_panic_event(). 
> 
> If panic_on_oops is not set, the task should be killed and kernel
> still runs. In this case, we may not trigger crash enlightenment.

I'm not completely clear on your last statement.   It seems like there
is still a problem in that die() will call hyperv_report_panic() even if
panic_on_oops is not set.  We will have reported a panic to Hyper-V
even though the VM did not stop running.

Michael




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux