The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c index 9977abff92fc..be957268f9d6 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ struct pci_packet { int resp_packet_size); void *compl_ctxt; - struct pci_message message[0]; + struct pci_message message[]; }; /* @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ struct pci_bus_d0_entry { struct pci_bus_relations { struct pci_incoming_message incoming; u32 device_count; - struct pci_function_description func[0]; + struct pci_function_description func[]; } __packed; struct pci_q_res_req_response { @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ struct hv_dr_work { struct hv_dr_state { struct list_head list_entry; u32 device_count; - struct pci_function_description func[0]; + struct pci_function_description func[]; }; enum hv_pcichild_state { -- 2.23.0