On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:16:58PM -0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: > The page allocated for struct hv_pcibus_device contains pointers to other > slab allocations in new_pcichild_device(). Since kmemleak does not track > and scan page allocations, the slab objects will be reported as leaks > (false positives). Use the kmemleak APIs to allow tracking of such pages. > > Reported-by: Lili Deng <v-lide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > This is actually v1. I use "v2" in the Subject just to be consistent with > the other patches in the patchset. That's a mistake, you should have posted patches separately. I need hyper-V ACKs on this series to get it through. Thanks, Lorenzo > Without the patch, we can see the below warning in dmesg, if kmemleak is > enabled: > > kmemleak: 1 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak) > > and "cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak" shows: > > unreferenced object 0xffff9217d1f2bec0 (size 192): > comm "kworker/u256:7", pid 100821, jiffies 4501481057 (age 61409.997s) > hex dump (first 32 bytes): > a8 60 b1 63 17 92 ff ff a8 60 b1 63 17 92 ff ff .`.c.....`.c.... > 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 92 cd 61 17 92 ff ff ...........a.... > backtrace: > [<0000000006f7ae93>] pci_devices_present_work+0x326/0x5e0 [pci_hyperv] > [<00000000278eb88a>] process_one_work+0x15f/0x360 > [<00000000c59501e6>] worker_thread+0x49/0x3c0 > [<000000000a0a7a94>] kthread+0xf8/0x130 > [<000000007075c2e7>] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > index d7e05d436b5e..cc73f49c9e03 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ > #include <asm/irqdomain.h> > #include <asm/apic.h> > #include <linux/irq.h> > +#include <linux/kmemleak.h> > #include <linux/msi.h> > #include <linux/hyperv.h> > #include <linux/refcount.h> > @@ -2907,6 +2908,16 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, > hbus = (struct hv_pcibus_device *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL); > if (!hbus) > return -ENOMEM; > + > + /* > + * kmemleak doesn't track page allocations as they are not commonly > + * used for kernel data structures, but here hbus->children indeed > + * contains pointers to hv_pci_dev structs, which are dynamically > + * created in new_pcichild_device(). Allow kmemleak to scan the page > + * so we don't get a false warning of memory leak. > + */ > + kmemleak_alloc(hbus, PAGE_SIZE, 1, GFP_KERNEL); > + > hbus->state = hv_pcibus_init; > > /* > @@ -3133,6 +3144,8 @@ static int hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev) > > hv_put_dom_num(hbus->sysdata.domain); > > + /* Remove kmemleak object previously allocated in hv_pci_probe() */ > + kmemleak_free(hbus); > free_page((unsigned long)hbus); > return ret; > } > -- > 2.19.1 >
