RE: [PATCH] Input: hyperv-keyboard: Add the support of hibernation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 10:46 AM
> To: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 06:44:04AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > ...
> > I think I understood now: it looks the vmbus driver should implement
> > a prepare() or freeze(), which calls the hyperv_keyboard driver's
> > prepare() or freeze(), which can set the flag or disable the keyboard
> > event handling. This way we don't need the notifier.
> 
> Right. I think in practice the current suspend implementation can work
> as freeze() for the HV keyboard, because in suspend you shut off vmbus
> channel, so there should not be wakeup signals anymore. What you do not
> want is to have the current resume to be used in place of thaw(), as
> there you re-enable the vmbus channel and resume sending wakeup requests
> as you are writing out the hibernation image to storage.
> 
> I think if vmbus allowed HV keyboard driver to supply empty thaw() and
> poweroff() implementations, while using suspend() as freeze() and
> resume() as restore(), it would solve the issue for you.
> 
> Dmitry

Hi Dmitry,
Sorry for the late reply! I finally came back on this patch. :-)
After I dug more into the issues, this is my understanding now:

As I checked the code in drivers/ , it doesn't look commom for a driver to
distinguish between thaw() and restore(). Typically a driver uses the macro
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() to define the dev_pm_ops, and the macro uses the
same function resume_fn as thaw() and restore().

BTW, the macro already uses the same function suspend_fn as suspend() and 
freeze(), and uses the same function resume_fn as resume() and restore(). And, 
it looks unusual for a driver to provide an empty thaw(), if any. If I follow your
suggestions, I'll have to fix the vmbus driver first (i.e. drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c: 
vmbus_pm()) by manually assigning a new function vmbus_thaw() to the 
thaw() dev_pm_op, and vmbus_thaw() should call the Hyper-V keyboard 
driver's empty hv_kbd_thaw(), meaning I have to add a .thaw function
pointer to the struct hv_driver. IMHO all these changes look too big just for
the rare corner cases of the unexpected wake-up issues.

More important, even if we make the suggested changes, we actually only fix
the unexpected wakeup caused by PMSG_THAW , and there are still some corner
cases of failures (please see below).

Before any of the dev_pm_op is called, the global counter 'pm_abort_suspend'
can be already non-zero, meaning pm_wakeup_pending() is true, so
try_to_freeze_tasks() returns -EBUSY, i.e. hibernate() -> freeze_processes()
or hibernate() -> hibernation_snapshot() -> freeze_kernel_threads() fails.

When the VM boots up and tries to resume from the saved file from
disk, before the fresh new kernel's Hyper-V keyboard device is PMSG_QUIESCE'ed,
the global counter 'pm_abort_suspend' can be already non-zero (I can cause this
scenario by holding the Enter key when the kernel starts), so
pm_wakeup_pending() is true, and the below freeze_processes() or
device_suspend() can return -EBUSY and the resume process fails.

 software_resume() ->
    freeze_processes()
      pm_wakeup_clear(true) -> Note: this resets the counter to 0.
      try_to_freeze_tasks ->
        pm_wakeup_pending
    load_image_and_restore() ->
      hibernation_restore() ->
        dpm_suspend_start() ->
          dpm_suspend() ->
            device_suspend() ->
              __device_suspend() ->
                pm_wakeup_pending()

IMO on a Linux physical machine these issues should happen as well. I think
we can fix them separately. For this patch, I suggest we keep it simple like
the below:

[PATCH v2] Input: hyperv-keyboard: Add the support of hibernation

During the suspend process and resume process, if there is any keyboard
event, there is a small chance the suspend and the resume process can be
aborted because of hv_kbd_on_receive() -> pm_wakeup_hard_event().

This behavior can be avoided by disabling the Hyper-V keyboard device as
a wakeup source:

echo disabled > /sys/bus/vmbus/drivers/hyperv_keyboard/XXX/power/wakeup
(XXX is the device's GUID).

Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c b/drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c
index e486a8a74c40..df4e9f6f4529 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c
@@ -259,6 +259,8 @@ static int hv_kbd_connect_to_vsp(struct hv_device *hv_dev)
        u32 proto_status;
        int error;

+       reinit_completion(&kbd_dev->wait_event);
+
        request = &kbd_dev->protocol_req;
        memset(request, 0, sizeof(struct synth_kbd_protocol_request));
        request->header.type = __cpu_to_le32(SYNTH_KBD_PROTOCOL_REQUEST);
@@ -380,6 +382,29 @@ static int hv_kbd_remove(struct hv_device *hv_dev)
        return 0;
 }

+static int hv_kbd_suspend(struct hv_device *hv_dev)
+{
+       vmbus_close(hv_dev->channel);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int hv_kbd_resume(struct hv_device *hv_dev)
+{
+       int ret;
+
+       ret = vmbus_open(hv_dev->channel,
+                        KBD_VSC_SEND_RING_BUFFER_SIZE,
+                        KBD_VSC_RECV_RING_BUFFER_SIZE,
+                        NULL, 0,
+                        hv_kbd_on_channel_callback,
+                        hv_dev);
+       if (ret == 0)
+               ret = hv_kbd_connect_to_vsp(hv_dev);
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
 static const struct hv_vmbus_device_id id_table[] = {
        /* Keyboard guid */
        { HV_KBD_GUID, },
@@ -393,6 +418,8 @@ static struct  hv_driver hv_kbd_drv = {
        .id_table = id_table,
        .probe = hv_kbd_probe,
        .remove = hv_kbd_remove,
+       .suspend = hv_kbd_suspend,
+       .resume = hv_kbd_resume,
        .driver = {
                .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
        },
--

I plan to post this as v2.

Looking forward to your comments!

Thanks,
-- Dexuan




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux