On 10/3/19 10:02 AM, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> Map "xen_nopvspin" to "nopvspin", fix stale description of "xen_nopvspin"
> as we use qspinlock now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
with a small nit
> void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void)
> {
> + if (nopvspin)
> + xen_pvspin = false;
>
> /* Don't need to use pvqspinlock code if there is only 1 vCPU. */
> if (num_possible_cpus() == 1)
I'd fold the change into this 'if' statement, I think it will still be
clear what the comment refers to.
-boris
