Re: [Patch v4] storvsc: setup 1:1 mapping between hardware queue and CPU queue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:24:20AM -0700, longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

storvsc doesn't use a dedicated hardware queue for a given CPU queue. When
issuing I/O, it selects returning CPU (hardware queue) dynamically based on
vmbus channel usage across all channels.

This patch advertises num_present_cpus() as number of hardware queues. This
will have upper layer setup 1:1 mapping between hardware queue and CPU queue
and avoid unnecessary locking when issuing I/O.

Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes:
v2: rely on default upper layer function to map queues. (suggested by Ming Lei
<tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx>)
v3: use num_present_cpus() instead of num_online_cpus(). Hyper-v doesn't
support hot-add CPUs. (suggested by Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
v4: move change logs to after Signed-of-by

drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
index b89269120a2d..cf987712041a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
@@ -1836,8 +1836,7 @@ static int storvsc_probe(struct hv_device *device,
	/*
	 * Set the number of HW queues we are supporting.
	 */
-	if (stor_device->num_sc != 0)
-		host->nr_hw_queues = stor_device->num_sc + 1;
+	host->nr_hw_queues = num_present_cpus();

Just looking at the change notes for v3: why isn't this
num_active_cpus() then? One can still isolate CPUs on hyper-v, no?

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux