Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] hwmon: (acpi_power_meter) Remove redundant 'sensors_valid' variable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Guenter,

在 2024/11/25 23:38, Guenter Roeck 写道:
On 11/25/24 01:34, Huisong Li wrote:
The 'sensors_valid' in acpi_power_meter_resource structure is always one
after querying power once. The default value of this variable is zero which just ensure user can query power successfully without any time requirement at first time. We can get power and fill the 'sensors_last_updated' field
at probing phase to make sure that a valid value is returned to user at
first query within the sampling interval. Then this redundant variable can
be safely removed.

Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c | 18 +++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
index 95da73858a0b..3500859ff0bf 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
@@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ struct acpi_power_meter_resource {
      u64        power;
      u64        cap;
      u64        avg_interval;
-    int            sensors_valid;
      unsigned long        sensors_last_updated;
      struct sensor_device_attribute    sensors[NUM_SENSORS];
      int            num_sensors;
@@ -316,15 +315,14 @@ static ssize_t set_trip(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
  }
    /* Power meter */
-static int update_meter(struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource)
+static int update_meter(struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource, bool check)
  {
      unsigned long long data;
      acpi_status status;
      unsigned long local_jiffies = jiffies;
  -    if (time_before(local_jiffies, resource->sensors_last_updated +
-            msecs_to_jiffies(resource->caps.sampling_time)) &&
-            resource->sensors_valid)
+    if (check && time_before(local_jiffies, resource->sensors_last_updated +
+            msecs_to_jiffies(resource->caps.sampling_time)))
          return 0;
        status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMM", @@ -336,7 +334,6 @@ static int update_meter(struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource)
      }
        resource->power = data;
-    resource->sensors_valid = 1;
      resource->sensors_last_updated = jiffies;
      return 0;
  }
@@ -349,7 +346,7 @@ static ssize_t show_power(struct device *dev,
      struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource = acpi_dev->driver_data;
        mutex_lock(&resource->lock);
-    update_meter(resource);
+    update_meter(resource, true);
      mutex_unlock(&resource->lock);
        if (resource->power == UNKNOWN_POWER)
@@ -429,7 +426,7 @@ static ssize_t show_val(struct device *dev,
              val = 0;
          break;
      case 6:
-        ret = update_meter(resource);
+        ret = update_meter(resource, true);
          if (ret)
              return ret;
          ret = update_cap(resource);
@@ -699,6 +696,10 @@ static int setup_attrs(struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource)
          return res;
        if (resource->caps.flags & POWER_METER_CAN_MEASURE) {
+        res = update_meter(resource, false);
+        if (res)
+            goto error;
+

This forces an update of the meter attribute even if no one reads it
subsequently for a long period of time. Avoiding that is the whole point
of the flag. Otherwise every driver using the flag could just read its
entire set of attributes to avoid it. I don't see the value of this patch,
sorry. You'd have to explain why it is better to do the unnecessary read
to avoid the flag.
It's just to make sure that the first query after driver is initialized can return a valid value when user echo the sysfs within the sampling time(namely, jiffies < sensors_last_updated + caps.sampling_time). The default value of the 'sensors_valid' in resource is zero, which just ensure user can query power successfully without any time requirement at first query. This read without check during probing phase is just for not to change the original behavior of the first query. Maybe my commit log didn't make it clear. Please take a look at the commit log of this patch again. Thanks.



.




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux