Re: [PATCH 10/16] x86/amd_nb: Move SMN access code to a new amd_smn driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:21:44PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index ba5252d8e21c..a03ffa5b6bb1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -3128,6 +3128,9 @@ config AMD_NODE
>  	def_bool y
>  	depends on CPU_SUP_AMD && PCI
>  
> +config AMD_SMN
> +	def_bool y
> +	depends on AMD_NODE

Why is this a separate compilation unit and not part of amd_node.c? Especially
if it depends on it.

I don't see the real need for having smaller compilation units. Both the node
and the smn stuff will end up being built-in in 99% of the configs. So why are
we making separate Kconfig items and yadda yadda?

Just do a single amd_node and that's it. We can always split later, if really
needed.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux