On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 07:39:31PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote: > On 2024-09-05 at 11:55:23 +0300, Raag Jadav wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 11:56:15AM +0530, Nilawar, Badal wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 28-08-2024 10:15, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > > Add hwmon support for temp1_input attribute, which will expose package > > > > temperature in millidegree Celsius. With this in place we can monitor > > > > package temperature using lm-sensors tool. > > > > > > > > $ sensors > > > > i915-pci-0300 > > > > Adapter: PCI adapter > > > > in0: 990.00 mV > > > > fan1: 1260 RPM > > > > temp1: +45.0°C > > > > power1: N/A (max = 35.00 W) > > > > energy1: 12.62 kJ > > > > > > > > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/11276 > > > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-i915-hwmon | 8 ++++ > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_mchbar_regs.h | 4 ++ > > > > 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-i915-hwmon b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-i915-hwmon > > > > index be4141a7522f..a885e5316d02 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-i915-hwmon > > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-i915-hwmon > > > > @@ -83,3 +83,11 @@ Contact: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Description: RO. Fan speed of device in RPM. > > > > Only supported for particular Intel i915 graphics platforms. > > > > + > > > > +What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/i915/.../hwmon/hwmon<i>/temp1_input > > > > +Date: November 2024 > > > > +KernelVersion: 6.12 > > > > +Contact: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > +Description: RO. GPU package temperature in millidegree Celsius. > > > > + > > > > + Only supported for particular Intel i915 graphics platforms. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c > > > > index 17d30f6b84b0..9f1a2300510b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_hwmon.c > > > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > > > > #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h> > > > > #include <linux/jiffies.h> > > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > > +#include <linux/units.h> > > > > #include "i915_drv.h" > > > > #include "i915_hwmon.h" > > > > @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ > > > > struct hwm_reg { > > > > i915_reg_t gt_perf_status; > > > > + i915_reg_t pkg_temp; > > > > i915_reg_t pkg_power_sku_unit; > > > > i915_reg_t pkg_power_sku; > > > > i915_reg_t pkg_rapl_limit; > > > > @@ -280,6 +282,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *hwm_groups[] = { > > > > }; > > > > static const struct hwmon_channel_info * const hwm_info[] = { > > > > + HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(temp, HWMON_T_INPUT), > > > > HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(in, HWMON_I_INPUT), > > > > HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(power, HWMON_P_MAX | HWMON_P_RATED_MAX | HWMON_P_CRIT), > > > > HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(energy, HWMON_E_INPUT), > > > > @@ -310,6 +313,36 @@ static int hwm_pcode_write_i1(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 uval) > > > > POWER_SETUP_SUBCOMMAND_WRITE_I1, 0, uval); > > > > } > > > > +static umode_t > > > > +hwm_temp_is_visible(const struct hwm_drvdata *ddat, u32 attr) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct i915_hwmon *hwmon = ddat->hwmon; > > > > + > > > > + if (attr == hwmon_temp_input && i915_mmio_reg_valid(hwmon->rg.pkg_temp)) > > > > + return 0444; > > > > + > > > > + return 0; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +static int > > > > +hwm_temp_read(struct hwm_drvdata *ddat, u32 attr, long *val) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct i915_hwmon *hwmon = ddat->hwmon; > > > > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref; > > > > + u32 reg_val; > > > > + > > > > + if (attr == hwmon_temp_input) { > > > > + with_intel_runtime_pm(ddat->uncore->rpm, wakeref) > > > > + reg_val = intel_uncore_read(ddat->uncore, hwmon->rg.pkg_temp); > > > > + > > > > + /* HW register value is in degrees, convert to millidegrees. */ > > > > + *val = REG_FIELD_GET(TEMP_MASK, reg_val) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE; > > > > + return 0; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > +} > > > Let's try to have synergy between previous attribute, such as hwm_fan_input, > > > and this one. > > > > This one's simple enough to be inline IMHO. > > Besides, it's already in synergy with hwm_in_read() which has similar > > implementation. > Agree this is pretty simple to have an any helper but IMO it would have been cleaner to have a switch > like hwm_in_read() to return -EOPNOTSUPP in default case. i think that was reason switch case was > used in entire file. Extending on the simplicity argument above, if() makes more sense for a single case. Raag
