On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 10:30:43AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > Due to the design, Sophgo SG2042 use an external MCU to provide > hardware information, thermal information and reset control. > > Add bindings for this monitor device. > > Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../hwmon/sophgo,sg2042-hwmon-mcu.yaml | 43 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/sophgo,sg2042-hwmon-mcu.yaml > > -- > 2.45.2 > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/sophgo,sg2042-hwmon-mcu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/sophgo,sg2042-hwmon-mcu.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..f0667ac41d75 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/sophgo,sg2042-hwmon-mcu.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/sophgo,sg2042-hwmon-mcu.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Sophgo SG2042 onboard MCU support > + > +maintainers: > + - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: sophgo,sg2042-hwmon-mcu According to the other patch, this actually covers four distinct models/devices. static const struct sg2042_mcu_board_data sg2042_boards_data[] = { > + { > + .id = 0x80, > + .name = "SG2042 evb x8", > + }, > + { > + .id = 0x81, > + .name = "SG2042R evb", > + }, > + { > + .id = 0x83, > + .name = "SG2042 evb x4", > + }, > + { > + .id = 0x90, > + .name = "Milk-V Pioneer", > + }, > +}; > + Is it really appropriate to use a single compatible property for all of those ? Guenter
