On 6/5/24 8:20 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 01:26:54PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote: >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > So yeah, I'll drop the CC:stable tagging in all patches unless we're > talking about a concrete issue. You need to think about the downstream, > distro folks who need to go through gazillion of patches and wonder > whether they really need to backport them. > > And I don't think misusing the stable process like that is the right > way. > I agree that patches 1-3 are not stable-worthy on their own. But I think patch 4 is, and it requires 1-3 to avoid build errors. Is there a preferred way to highlight this while patches are in review? Thanks, Yazen
