On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 08:11:13PM +0000, Chris Packham wrote: > On 21/02/24 08:21, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:18:24AM +1300, Chris Packham wrote: > > The one thing I do want the comment on is the number of examples. > > I don't really see what we gain from having 3 - I'd roll the clock > > provider example into with one of the other ones I think. > The 3 examples are an artifact of me combining the in-flight max313xx > series with the one that landed. The clock output is only valid for some > chips but that's probably just a matter of picking the right compatible. Yeah, I think you could collapse it in, if you modify the compatible appropriately. Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
