On 15/01/2024 09:43, Billy Tsai wrote:
>>>>> +examples:
>>>>> + - |
>>>>> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h>
>>>>> + pwm_tach: pwm-tach-controller@1e610000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach";
>>>>> + reg = <0x1e610000 0x100>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&syscon ASPEED_CLK_AHB>;
>>>>> + resets = <&syscon ASPEED_RESET_PWM>;
>>>>> + #pwm-cells = <3>;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + fan-0 {
>>>>> + tach-ch = /bits/ 8 <0x0>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + fan-1 {
>>>>> + tach-ch = /bits/ 8 <0x1 0x2>;
>>>>> + };
>>>
>>>> NAK on this based on how you are using pwm-fan in v10 discussion. See my
>>>> comments there.
>>>
>>> Okay, I will merge everything from the pwm-fan0 node into the fan-0 node
>>> and add the 'simple-bus' to the compatible string of the pwm_tach node.
>
>> What simple-bus has anything to do with it? This is not a bus. Just to
>> remind: we talk about bindings, not driver.
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> If I want to create a dt-binding to indicate that the child nodes
> should be treated as platform devices, which will be probed based on the
probed? Bindings do not probe. You ignored:
"we talk about bindings, not driver."
> compatible string, can I add "simple-bus" for our pwm_tach node like the
> following?
No, because this is not a bus.
> pwm_tach: pwm-tach-controller@1e610000 {
> compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach", "simple-bus";
> reg = <0x1e610000 0x100>;
> clocks = <&syscon ASPEED_CLK_AHB>;
> resets = <&syscon ASPEED_RESET_PWM>;
> #pwm-cells = <3>;
>
> fan-0 {
> tach-ch = /bits/ 8 <0x0>;
> compatible = "pwm-fan";
> pwms = <&pwm_tach 0 40000 0>;
> };
>
> fan-1 {
> tach-ch = /bits/ 8 <0x1 0x2>;
> compatible = "pwm-fan";
> pwms = <&pwm_tach 1 40000 0>;
> };
> };
> Or do you have any other suggestions for describing this in the dt-bindings?
There is no need to describe it in the bindings. The existing compatible
describes it sufficiently. Your pwms now duplicate the tach-ch... I
don't understand what you want to achieve here in terms of hardware
description (again, please steer away from talking about Linux drivers
and probing, it's not related).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
