Hi Krzysztof,
On 24-04-2023 03:23 pm, Naresh Solanki wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On 24-04-2023 03:12 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 24/04/2023 11:18, Naresh Solanki wrote:
Changes in V2:
- Update subject
- Drop blank lines
---
.../bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml | 52
+++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1aaedfd7cee0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Maxim max6639
What is this device? fan controller?
Yes Fan controller.
Do you want me to update the title here as:
"Maxim MAC6639 2 channel fan controller & temperature monitor" ?
Enough would be:
Maxim MAX6639 Fan Controller
Ack
+
+maintainers:
+ - Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+description: |
+ The MAX6639 is a 2-channel temperature monitor with dual,
automatic, PWM
+ fan-speed controller. It monitors its own temperature and one
external
+ diode-connected transistor or the temperatures of two external
diode-connected
+ transistors, typically available in CPUs, FPGAs, or GPUs.
+
+ Datasheets:
+ https://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/MAX6639-MAX6639F.pdf
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - maxim,max6639
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ '#address-cells':
+ const: 1
+
+ '#size-cells':
+ const: 0
Why do you need these two properties?
Ack. Will remove them.
Anyway, the binding looks incomplete. Where are the supplies?
Interrupts?
This patch just adds basic support to the existing platform driver.
Intention is to be able to call the driver from DT with basic
initialization from driver the existing driver.
Bindings should be rather complete. Here the datasheet is accessible and
few properties quite obvious, so I don't see a reason to skip them.
I agree with you. But currently the driver which is already merged
doesn't has it implemented.
And will be working on separate patch to include this later.
Please let me know if this approach is acceptable, or if there are any
other suggestions or concerns that you have.
Thanks,
Naresh
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Regards,
Naresh.
