On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:58:24 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3/15/23 14:30, Denis Pauk wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:01:35 +0200 > > Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Tested-by: Holger Kiehl <holger.kiehl@xxxxxx> > > > > Pro A520M-C II/CSM is also tested by Holger Kiehl > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/868bdc4f-9d45-475c-963e-f5232a8b95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Could it be applied as single patch or need to rebase over "Pro A520M-C II" > > patch? > > > Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say. I just applied all > patches in sequence as received, with no conflicts. Should I undo that ? > > Guenter > No, Thank you! I just like to mention that Holger Kiehl sent separate patch with "Pro A520M-C II" support and it could create conflicts. I have found it only when I have sent my patches.
