On 1/30/23 14:19, Frank Crawford wrote:
On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 10:42 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 1/29/23 12:56, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 05:03:02PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote:
Disabling configuration mode on some chips can result in system
hang-ups and access failures to the Super-IO chip at the
second SIO address. Never exit configuration mode on these
chips to avoid the problem.
This patch should be applied in conjunction with a previous one
to
initialise the second chip for certain mother boards.
Signed-off-by: Frank Crawford <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3:
* Correct possible uninitialised pointer issue.
v2:
* Convert to use feature flag and related macros rather than a
separate
field, as suggested in review.
* Reverse sense of flag in superio_exit to simplify feature
macro.
---
drivers/hwmon/it87.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/it87.c b/drivers/hwmon/it87.c
index a8a6a0ffee82..923a9563be92 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/it87.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/it87.c
@@ -128,10 +128,12 @@ static inline int superio_enter(int ioreg)
return 0;
}
-static inline void superio_exit(int ioreg)
+static inline void superio_exit(int ioreg, bool noexit)
{
- outb(0x02, ioreg);
- outb(0x02, ioreg + 1);
+ if (!noexit) {
+ outb(0x02, ioreg);
+ outb(0x02, ioreg + 1);
+ }
release_region(ioreg, 2);
}
@@ -300,6 +302,13 @@ struct it87_devices {
#define FEAT_PWM_FREQ2 BIT(16) /* Separate pwm
freq 2 */
#define FEAT_SIX_TEMP BIT(17) /* Up to 6 temp sensors
*/
#define FEAT_VIN3_5V BIT(18) /* VIN3 connected to +5V
*/
+/*
+ * Disabling configuration mode on some chips can result in
system
+ * hang-ups and access failures to the Super-IO chip at the
+ * second SIO address. Never exit configuration mode on these
+ * chips to avoid the problem.
+ */
+#define FEAT_CONF_NOEXIT BIT(28) /* Chip should not exit
conf mode */
Feature bits are supposed to be numbered sequentially, not randomly
assigned. Please use bit 19.
Given that the commit window is coming up, and since I don't have
other issues with your series, I am inclined to apply it with the
bit changed. Please let me know in the next day or two if this is
acceptable for you. If not, the series will have to wait until v6.4.
Yes, I'm okay with that.
I was planning to submit an update with the only changes being both of
your changes in your previous comment, but the second one can wait for
a later group if you are happy with that.
The other change request was a minor optimization. Just leave it alone.
Series applied to hwmon-next, with bit changed from 28 to 19.
Guenter