Hello Guenter, On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 12:50:55PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 9/25/22 12:18, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 07:26:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > Declarations for static symbols are useless code repetition (unless > > > > there are cyclic dependencies). > > > > > > > > Reorder some functions and variables which allows to get rid of 42 > > > > forward declarations. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Applied to hwmon-next. > > > > Thanks for your prompt action on my patches, very appreciated! > > > > Let me just note two things: > > > > a) vger refused to accept this mail with "Message too long (>100000 > > chars)", so I guess it won't appear in the archives > > I guess that explains why I don't see all patches in patchwork. The f71882fg was the first one of my patches that vger refused. I didn't check, but vger at least didn't tell me about my other patches that it refused any of them. > > b) Your reply didn't have a "In-Reply-To:" header, so the threading is > > broken. Because of a) you cannot see this in the archives, but it > > happend already before, but not on all the mail I got from you. An > > earlier instance is > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20220923002301.GA1159397@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Some of the e-mails I reply from mutt, others from Thunderbird. I suspect > that one of them doesn't add the "In-Reply-To:" header. This one is from > Thunderbird. I'll send another one without Cc: from mutt. Please let me know > which one is missing the header. Both of these mails have the In-Reply-To header. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
