On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:28:05AM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: > When reading the 'port_status' debugfs entry, some I2C registers were > read more than once. This looks inefficient in an I2C trace. > > To reduce I2C traffic, update tps23861_port_status_show() to only read > each register once. Indexing the port number from 0 instead of 1 also > allows simplifying things a bit, resulting in a negative line count. "resulting in a negative line count" That took me a while to understand. Please rephrase or drop. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/hwmon/tps23861.c | 75 ++++++++++++---------------------------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tps23861.c b/drivers/hwmon/tps23861.c > index f7c59ff7ae8e..0dbd12060b50 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/tps23861.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tps23861.c > @@ -372,29 +372,12 @@ static const struct hwmon_chip_info tps23861_chip_info = { > .info = tps23861_info, > }; > > -static char *tps23861_port_operating_mode(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > +static char *port_operating_mode_string(uint8_t mode_reg, unsigned int port) > { > - unsigned int regval; > - int mode; > - > - regmap_read(data->regmap, OPERATING_MODE, ®val); > + unsigned int mode = ~0; > > - switch (port) { > - case 1: > - mode = FIELD_GET(OPERATING_MODE_PORT_1_MASK, regval); > - break; > - case 2: > - mode = FIELD_GET(OPERATING_MODE_PORT_2_MASK, regval); > - break; > - case 3: > - mode = FIELD_GET(OPERATING_MODE_PORT_3_MASK, regval); > - break; > - case 4: > - mode = FIELD_GET(OPERATING_MODE_PORT_4_MASK, regval); > - break; > - default: > - mode = -EINVAL; > - } > + if (port < TPS23861_NUM_PORTS) > + mode = (mode_reg >> (2 * port)) & OPERATING_MODE_PORT_1_MASK; > > switch (mode) { > case OPERATING_MODE_OFF: > @@ -410,15 +393,9 @@ static char *tps23861_port_operating_mode(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > } > } > > -static char *tps23861_port_detect_status(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > +static char *port_detect_status_string(uint8_t status_reg) > { > - unsigned int regval; > - > - regmap_read(data->regmap, > - PORT_1_STATUS + (port - 1), > - ®val); > - > - switch (FIELD_GET(PORT_STATUS_DETECT_MASK, regval)) { > + switch (FIELD_GET(PORT_STATUS_DETECT_MASK, status_reg)) { > case PORT_DETECT_UNKNOWN: > return "Unknown device"; > case PORT_DETECT_SHORT: > @@ -448,15 +425,9 @@ static char *tps23861_port_detect_status(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > } > } > > -static char *tps23861_port_class_status(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > +static char *port_class_status_string(uint8_t status_reg) > { > - unsigned int regval; > - > - regmap_read(data->regmap, > - PORT_1_STATUS + (port - 1), > - ®val); > - > - switch (FIELD_GET(PORT_STATUS_CLASS_MASK, regval)) { > + switch (FIELD_GET(PORT_STATUS_CLASS_MASK, status_reg)) { > case PORT_CLASS_UNKNOWN: > return "Unknown"; > case PORT_CLASS_RESERVED: > @@ -479,16 +450,9 @@ static char *tps23861_port_class_status(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > } > } > > -static char *tps23861_port_poe_plus_status(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > +static char *port_poe_plus_status_string(uint8_t poe_plus, unsigned int port) > { > - unsigned int regval; > - > - regmap_read(data->regmap, POE_PLUS, ®val); > - > - if (BIT(port + 3) & regval) > - return "Yes"; > - else > - return "No"; > + return (BIT(port + 4) & poe_plus) ? "Yes" : "No"; > } > > static int tps23861_port_resistance(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > @@ -497,7 +461,7 @@ static int tps23861_port_resistance(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > __le16 regval; > > regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, > - PORT_1_RESISTANCE_LSB + PORT_N_RESISTANCE_LSB_OFFSET * (port - 1), > + PORT_1_RESISTANCE_LSB + PORT_N_RESISTANCE_LSB_OFFSET * port, > ®val, > 2); > > @@ -517,14 +481,19 @@ static int tps23861_port_resistance(struct tps23861_data *data, int port) > static int tps23861_port_status_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data) > { > struct tps23861_data *priv = s->private; > - int i; > + unsigned int i, mode, poe_plus, status; > + > + regmap_read(priv->regmap, OPERATING_MODE, &mode); > + regmap_read(priv->regmap, POE_PLUS, &poe_plus); > + > + for (i = 0; i < TPS23861_NUM_PORTS; i++) { > + regmap_read(priv->regmap, PORT_1_STATUS + i, &status); > > - for (i = 1; i < TPS23861_NUM_PORTS + 1; i++) { > seq_printf(s, "Port: \t\t%d\n", i); This changes the port number output from 1..4 to 0..3. Why ? I can understand the code change, but that doesn't mean the output has to change as well. Thanks, Guenter > - seq_printf(s, "Operating mode: %s\n", tps23861_port_operating_mode(priv, i)); > - seq_printf(s, "Detected: \t%s\n", tps23861_port_detect_status(priv, i)); > - seq_printf(s, "Class: \t\t%s\n", tps23861_port_class_status(priv, i)); > - seq_printf(s, "PoE Plus: \t%s\n", tps23861_port_poe_plus_status(priv, i)); > + seq_printf(s, "Operating mode: %s\n", port_operating_mode_string(mode, i)); > + seq_printf(s, "Detected: \t%s\n", port_detect_status_string(status)); > + seq_printf(s, "Class: \t\t%s\n", port_class_status_string(status)); > + seq_printf(s, "PoE Plus: \t%s\n", port_poe_plus_status_string(poe_plus, i)); > seq_printf(s, "Resistance: \t%d\n", tps23861_port_resistance(priv, i)); > seq_putc(s, '\n'); > }