On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 03:21:53 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > I had a quick look and couldn't see anything obviously wrong, but then > > > I'm no expert with the hwmon code. > > > > That makes two of us, good enough! :) Thanks for taking a look. > > It would of been nice to Cc: the HWMON maintainer. His input would of > been just as valuable as a PHY Maintainer. Fair point, I lazy'd out and only checked that everyone get_maintainers asks for was CCed. Perhaps it'd be worth extending the hwmon's keyword match to trigger on the structs or the constants if it matters. Adding hwmon@ to CC just in case.
