On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 11:11 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 12:41:44AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > smp_num_siblings can be larger than 2.
>
> Not on a P4 it can't ;-)
Kernel code doesn't prevent this from happening, so it just depends on
how SMT ID is encoded in APICID.
Checking for smp_num_sibling > 1 is the right logic to detect HT
support, which is followed by all other kernel code except this one. :)
thanks,
rui
>
> > Any value larger than 1 suggests HT is supported.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
> > index 94de1a05aeba..b14e9a20a7c0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
> > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static inline int p4_ht_active(void)
> > static inline int p4_ht_thread(int cpu)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > - if (smp_num_siblings == 2)
> > + if (smp_num_siblings > 1)
> > return cpu !=
> > cpumask_first(this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(cpu_sibling_map));
> > #endif
> > return 0;
>
> Unless Intel plans to respin an P4 with extra siblings on, I don't
> think
> this qualifies for the word 'fix'.
