Re: [PATCH 7/7] perf/x86/intel/P4: Fix smp_num_siblings usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> smp_num_siblings can be larger than 2.
> 
> Any value larger than 1 suggests HT is supported.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
> index 94de1a05aeba..b14e9a20a7c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event_p4.h
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static inline int p4_ht_active(void)
>  static inline int p4_ht_thread(int cpu)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -	if (smp_num_siblings == 2)
> +	if (smp_num_siblings > 1)
>  		return cpu != cpumask_first(this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(cpu_sibling_map));

This fix too should probably come before all the other changes.

(Not that Pentium 4 code is expected to ever see such SMT thread values.)

Thanks,

	Ingo



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux