Am 10.08.22 um 03:39 schrieb Zev Weiss:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 04:50:20PM PDT, Zoltán Kővágó wrote:
On 2022-08-10 00:34, Zev Weiss wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 02:28:20PM PDT, Zoltán Kővágó wrote:
On 2022-08-09 22:56, Zev Weiss wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 01:27:48PM PDT, Zoltán Kővágó wrote:
Hi,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
NCT6775: suspend doesn't work after updating to Linux 5.19
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
After updating my kernel from 5.18.11 to 5.19, I've noticed that
resuming after suspend no longer works: fans start up, then about
a second later, the computer just shuts down, leaving the USB
ports powered up (normally it turns them off on shutdown). The
screens don't turn on during this timeframe, so I can't see any
useful log messages.
Bisecting between 5.18 (where it still worked) and 5.19 lead me
to commit c3963bc0a0cf9ecb205a9d4976eb92b6df2fa3fd "hwmon:
(nct6775) Split core and platform driver" which looks like a
refactor commit, but apparently it broke something.
Hi Zoltán,
Thanks for the thorough bug report. You're right that that commit
was essentially just a refactor, though there was one slight
change to the nct6775_suspend() function introduced during the
review process that may perhaps have had some subtle unintended
side-effects.
Can you test the following patch and report if it resolves the
problem?
Thanks,
Zev
Hi Zev,
Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, it looks like your patch does
solve the problem (I've applied it on top of 5.19 (after fighting
with my mail client for a while) and suspended a few times, it's
working so far).
Regards,
Zoltan
Great, thanks.
Guenter, it looks like nct6775_suspend() really does in fact need to
use nct6775_update_device() instead of dev_get_drvdata(), though
it's not immediately obvious to me why. Though given that the bulk
of of the body of nct6775_update_device() is inside an 'if' block
that might not necessarily execute every time, I also wonder if it
might be vulnerable to exhibiting the same problem depending on timing.
Zoltán, if you could try another experiment to try to gather some
data on that -- with the patch from my previous email still applied,
could you try suspending via:
$ cat
/sys/bus/platform/drivers/nct6775/nct6775.*/hwmon/hwmon*/*_input &&
echo mem > /sys/power/state
Tried it, three times in fact, and it worked fine every time. Looking
at the dmesg, though, it looks like it needs a bit more than 1.5 sec
to suspend. Where's that 1.5 sec limit defined? I will try to
increase it tomorrow.
The 1.5 second duration comes from this line in nct6775_update_device():
if (time_after(jiffies, data->last_updated + HZ + HZ / 2)
Each 'HZ' represents one second, so HZ + HZ / 2 = 1.5 sec; if you want
to lengthen it you could do e.g. 10 * HZ or something instead.
Though as Guenter noted, one other possibility is that with the
previous (buggy) version nct6775_update_device() might never have
gotten called at all -- do you know if that might be the case on your
system? (i.e. do you have any userspace monitoring program or the
like that would have been reading from the nct6775 device's sensors?)
If something like that never ran between the driver getting loaded and
the system suspending, that might also (partially) explain things; to
test that out you could revert to the old buggy code and see if the
suspend problem still occurs if you explicitly run
$ cat /sys/bus/platform/drivers/nct6775/nct6775.*/hwmon/hwmon*/*_input
(or just 'sensors' if you've got the lm-sensors package installed).
That will
ensure that nct6775_update_device() gets called before the suspend
operation, which could help narrow things down further.
In case you are running a Debian-based distribution, please note that Debian unconditionally executes sensors on startup, something
i discovered when the dell-smm-hwmon driver was causing issues on my machine.
So you may need to temporarily disable lm-sensors.service and/or /etc/init.d/lm-sensors for testing.
Armin Wolf
Thanks,
Zev
