On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 13:47:07 +0300 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Several of the bindings here had only one > maintainer and history does not always point to a new one (although I did not > perform extensive digging). I added subsystem maintainer, because dtschema > requires such entry. This is not the best choice as simply subsystem maintainer > might not have the actual device (or its datasheets or any interest in it). > > However dtschema requires a maintainer. Maybe we could add some > "orphaned" entry in such case? Integrating it with MAINTAINERS would be another option worth exploring although slightly tangential. How do you want this merged? It's all over the place subsystem-wise.
