On 4/29/22 02:52, Camel Guo wrote:
Add the missing of_match_table to allow device tree probing
I2C devices probe based on the I2C device table even on devicetree systems,
so this isn't a correct statement. Please provide evidence and explain
in detail the circumstances where this does not work.
Guenter
Signed-off-by: Camel Guo <camel.guo@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c
index a58a2f31a07e..cc0a1c219b1f 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c
@@ -750,10 +750,21 @@ static int tmp401_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
return 0;
}
+static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused tmp4xx_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "ti,tmp401", },
+ { .compatible = "ti,tmp411", },
+ { .compatible = "ti,tmp431", },
+ { .compatible = "ti,tmp432", },
+ { .compatible = "ti,tmp435", },
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tmp4xx_of_match);
+
static struct i2c_driver tmp401_driver = {
.class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
.driver = {
.name = "tmp401",
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tmp4xx_of_match),
},
.probe_new = tmp401_probe,
.id_table = tmp401_id,
