On 4/27/22 14:50, Ruslan Zalata wrote:
Jernej,
Are these CHECKs ok to pass ?
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#314: FILE: drivers/hwmon/sun4i-lradc-hwmon.c:231:
+ lradc->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev,
+ platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
0));
Use an intermediate variable. You need to do that anyway because
platform_get_resource() can return NULL which needs to be checked.
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#319: FILE: drivers/hwmon/sun4i-lradc-hwmon.c:236:
+ error = devm_request_irq(dev, platform_get_irq(pdev, 0),
+ sun4i_lradc_irq, 0, "sun4i-lradc-hwmon",
lradc);
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 2 checks, 307 lines checked
Aligning above by paranthesis will make code look ugly and exceed 75
chars limit. Please advise.
What 75 characters limit ?
You can go up to 100 characters if needed. Also, platform_get_irq()
can return an error, which needs to be checked anyway.
Please prepend the subject replies with Re: as is current practice.
Your replies all look like patches, not like replies to patches.
More comments inline.
Guenter
---
Regards,
Ruslan.
Fabmicro, LLC.
On 2022-04-28 02:12, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
Dne sreda, 27. april 2022 ob 23:01:58 CEST je Ruslan Zalata
napisal(a):
Dear Jernej and all.
I used sendmail instead of "git send-email" and it did the whole
this
wrong - several separate emails were sent. I'm sorry for that, will
stick to git command next time.
I read the guide of course and I fed the patch through
scripts/checkpatch.pl many times in an effort to elaborate all the
errors and warnings. The only warning left is this:
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need
updating?
#61:
new file mode 100644
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 304 lines checked
Did you used --strict? Anyway, you have multiple consecutive empty
lines in
several places. Only one empty line is allowed.
Since this is my first attempt to submit my code I'm quite confused
whom
should I add as a maintainer for this driver. :)
Usually yourself.
PS: What's wrong with the subject ?
Too long and ARM is not a proper tag. Check git history of
drivers/hwmon
folder for ideas.
Best regards,
Jernej
---
Regards,
Ruslan.
Fabmicro, LLC.
On 2022-04-28 01:23, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> Hi Ruslan!
>
> Dne sreda, 27. april 2022 ob 21:25:12 CEST je Ruslan Zalata napisal(a):
>> Some Allwinner SoCs like A13, A20 or T2 are equipped with two-channel
>> low rate (6 bit) ADC that is often used for extra keys. There's a
>> driver
>> for that already implementing standard input device, but it has these
>> limitations: 1) it cannot be used for general ADC data equisition, and
>> 2) it uses only one LRADC channel of two available.
>>
>> This driver provides basic hwmon interface to both channels of LRADC
>> on
>> such Allwinner SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ruslan Zalata <rz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Before even going to check actual driver, please read
> https://www.kernel.org/
> doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html in detail.
>
> Just few basic things to fix first:
> 1. subject doesn't conform to rules
> 2. send patch to maintainers and mailing lists (use
> scripts/get_maintainer.pl)
> 3. code has style issues (multiple empty lines). Run
> scripts/checkpatch.pl --
> strict on your patch before submission and fix all reported issues.
> 4. you sent same patch two times. If it's same, it should be marked
> with
> RESEND, if not, it should be versioned (V2, V3, etc.) with short
> changelog
> after --- line (as explained in above link)
> 5. it's customary to add new entry in MAINTAINERS when adding new
> driver
>
> Best regards,
> Jernej
>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 13 ++
>> drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/hwmon/sun4i-lradc-hwmon.c | 278
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> 3 files changed, 292 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/sun4i-lradc-hwmon.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
>> index 68a8a27ab3b..b7732a9e992 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
>> @@ -521,6 +521,19 @@ config I8K
>>
>> Say Y if you intend to run userspace programs that use this
>
> interface.
>
>> Say N otherwise.
>>
>> +config SENSORS_SUN4I_LRADC
Try to put in alphabetic order.
>> + tristate "Allwinner A13/A20 LRADC hwmon"
>> + depends on ARCH_SUNXI && (!KEYBOARD_SUN4I_LRADC)
Drop the unnecessary ()
>> + help
>> + Say y here to support the LRADC found in Allwinner A13/A20 SoCs.
>> + Both channels are supported.
>> +
>> + This driver can also be built as module. If so, the module
>> + will be called sun4i-lradc-hwmon.
>> +
>> + This option is not compatible with KEYBOARD_SUN4I_LRADC, one
>> + of these should be used at a time.
Only one of these must be ...
>> +
>>
>> config SENSORS_DA9052_ADC
>>
>> tristate "Dialog DA9052/DA9053 ADC"
>> depends on PMIC_DA9052
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
>> index 8a03289e2aa..43bed6fff27 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7314) += ad7314.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7414) += ad7414.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7418) += ad7418.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ADC128D818) += adc128d818.o
>>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SUN4I_LRADC) += sun4i-lradc-hwmon.o
Alphabetic order please.
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ADCXX) += adcxx.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1021) += adm1021.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1025) += adm1025.o
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sun4i-lradc-hwmon.c
>> b/drivers/hwmon/sun4i-lradc-hwmon.c new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..1947b716dbf
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sun4i-lradc-hwmon.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +/*
>> + * Allwinner sun4i (A13/A20) LRADC hwmon driver
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Fabmicro, LLC., Tyumen, Russia.
>> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Ruslan Zalata <rz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/input.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
>> +#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
Alphabetic order, and only include files which are actually needed.
>> +
>> +#define LRADC_CTRL 0x00
>> +#define LRADC_INTC 0x04
>> +#define LRADC_INTS 0x08
>> +#define LRADC_DATA0 0x0c
>> +#define LRADC_DATA1 0x10
Alignment seems off. Did you use spaces ?
>> +
>> +/* LRADC_CTRL bits */
>> +#define FIRST_CONVERT_DLY(x) ((x) << 24) /* 8 bits */
>> +#define CHAN_SELECT(x) ((x) << 22) /* 2 bits */
>> +#define CONTINUE_TIME_SEL(x) ((x) << 16) /* 4 bits */
>> +#define KEY_MODE_SEL(x) ((x) << 12) /* 2 bits */
>> +#define LEVELA_B_CNT(x) ((x) << 8) /* 4 bits */
>> +#define HOLD_KEY_EN(x) ((x) << 7)
>> +#define HOLD_EN(x) ((x) << 6)
>> +#define LEVELB_VOL(x) ((x) << 4) /* 2 bits */
>> +#define SAMPLE_RATE(x) ((x) << 2) /* 2 bits */
>> +#define ENABLE(x) ((x) << 0)
>> +
>> +/* LRADC_INTC and LRADC_INTS bits */
>> +#define CHAN1_KEYUP_IRQ BIT(12)
>> +#define CHAN1_ALRDY_HOLD_IRQ BIT(11)
>> +#define CHAN1_HOLD_IRQ BIT(10)
>> +#define CHAN1_KEYDOWN_IRQ BIT(9)
>> +#define CHAN1_DATA_IRQ BIT(8)
>> +#define CHAN0_KEYUP_IRQ BIT(4)
>> +#define CHAN0_ALRDY_HOLD_IRQ BIT(3)
>> +#define CHAN0_HOLD_IRQ BIT(2)
>> +#define CHAN0_KEYDOWN_IRQ BIT(1)
>> +#define CHAN0_DATA_IRQ BIT(0)
Odd alignment. It should be all
#define<space>NAME<tab>value
>> +
>> +
>> +struct lradc_variant {
>> + u32 bits;
>> + u32 resolution;
>> + u32 vref;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct lradc_variant variant_sun4i_a10_lradc = {
>> + .bits = 0x3f,
>> + .resolution = 63,
>> + .vref = 2000000,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct lradc_variant variant_sun8i_a83t_r_lradc = {
>> + .bits = 0x3f,
>> + .resolution = 63,
>> + .vref = 2000000,
>> +};
What is the point of all this as it is all the same ?
And the ADC has really only 6 bit of resolution ?
Also, what decides vref ? Is this a fixed value or is it
board dependent or configurable ?
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id sun4i_lradc_of_match[];
>> +
Please reorder code to not require forward declarations.
>> +
>> +struct sun4i_lradc_data {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct device *hwmon_dev;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + const struct lradc_variant *variant;
>> + u32 in[2];
>> + u32 in_mvolts[2];
>> +};
>> +
>> +
>> +static ssize_t lradc_in_mvolts_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct sun4i_lradc_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int nr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(attr)->nr;
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(data))
>> + return PTR_ERR(data);
>> +
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", data->in_mvolts[nr]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t lradc_in_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct sun4i_lradc_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int nr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(attr)->nr;
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(data))
>> + return PTR_ERR(data);
>> +
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", data->in[nr]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static umode_t lradc_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
>> + struct attribute *attr, int index)
>> +{
>> + return attr->mode;
>> +}
Completely pointless function.
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_2_RO(in0_input, lradc_in, 0, 0);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_2_RO(in0_input_mvolts, lradc_in_mvolts, 0,
Only standard attributes please. What is the point anyway ? Voltage is
reported in mV, period. If you want to report raw values, you'll need
to
write an iio driver. FWIW, that may be more appropriate anyway since
the other ADC on this chip is already handled with an iio driver.
>> 1);
>> +
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_2_RO(in1_input, lradc_in, 1, 0);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_2_RO(in1_input_mvolts, lradc_in_mvolts, 1,
>> 1);
>> +
>> +static struct attribute *lradc_attrs[] = {
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in0_input.dev_attr.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in0_input_mvolts.dev_attr.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in1_input.dev_attr.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in1_input_mvolts.dev_attr.attr,
>> + NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct attribute_group lradc_group = {
>> + .attrs = lradc_attrs,
>> + .is_visible = lradc_is_visible,
>> +};
>> +__ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(lradc);
>> +
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t sun4i_lradc_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct sun4i_lradc_data *lradc = dev_id;
>> + u32 ints;
>> +
>> + ints = readl(lradc->base + LRADC_INTS);
>> +
>> + if (ints & CHAN0_DATA_IRQ) {
>> + lradc->in[0] = readl(lradc->base + LRADC_DATA0) &
>> + lradc->variant->bits;
>> + lradc->in_mvolts[0] = lradc->in[0] * lradc->variant-
>> vref /
>> + lradc->variant->resolution / 1000;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (ints & CHAN1_DATA_IRQ) {
>> + lradc->in[1] = readl(lradc->base + LRADC_DATA1) &
>> + lradc->variant->bits;
>> + lradc->in_mvolts[1] = lradc->in[1] * lradc->variant-
>> vref /
>> + lradc->variant->resolution / 1000;
>> + }
>> +
>> + writel(ints, lradc->base + LRADC_INTS);
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
This is highly unusual. Why keep reading those values ? hwmon drivers
report data on request and are not continuously polling values.
>> +
>> +static int sun4i_lradc_open(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct sun4i_lradc_data *lradc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + writel(FIRST_CONVERT_DLY(2) | CHAN_SELECT(3) | LEVELA_B_CNT(1) |
>> + HOLD_EN(1) | KEY_MODE_SEL(2) | SAMPLE_RATE(3) |
>
> ENABLE(1),
>
>> + lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL);
>> +
>> + writel(CHAN0_DATA_IRQ | CHAN1_DATA_IRQ, lradc->base + LRADC_INTC);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sun4i_lradc_close(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct sun4i_lradc_data *lradc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + writel(FIRST_CONVERT_DLY(2) | LEVELA_B_CNT(1) | HOLD_EN(1) |
>> + SAMPLE_RATE(2), lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL);
>> + writel(0, lradc->base + LRADC_INTC);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sun4i_lradc_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + return sun4i_lradc_open(dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sun4i_lradc_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> pm_message_t
>> state) +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + sun4i_lradc_close(dev);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sun4i_lradc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + sun4i_lradc_close(dev);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct sun4i_lradc_data *lradc;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + int error;
>> +
>> + lradc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct sun4i_lradc_data),
>
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
>> + if (!lradc)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, lradc);
>> +
>> + lradc->variant = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (!lradc->variant) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing '%s' or '%s' variant\n",
>> + sun4i_lradc_of_match[0].compatible,
>> + sun4i_lradc_of_match[1].compatible);
Drop the noise. Just return -EINVAL.
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + lradc->dev = dev;
>> + lradc->hwmon_dev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups(dev,
hwmon_dev is unnecessary in lradc.
>
> "lradc",
Use devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info()
>
>> +
>
> lradc, lradc_groups);
>
>> + if (IS_ERR(lradc->hwmon_dev)) {
>> + error = PTR_ERR(lradc->hwmon_dev);
>> + return error;
>> + }
>> +
>> + lradc->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev,
>> + platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>
> 0));
>
>> + if (IS_ERR(lradc->base))
>> + return PTR_ERR(lradc->base);
>> +
>> + error = devm_request_irq(dev, platform_get_irq(pdev, 0),
>> + sun4i_lradc_irq, 0, "sun4i-lradc-hwmon",
>
This is all completely racy and must be done before registering
the hwmon device.
> lradc);
>
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> +
>> + error = sun4i_lradc_open(dev);
What does this function do ? Its name is misleading. There is no
"open".
It seems to me it is really start/stop. If so, name it accordingly.
The stop function should be handled with devm_add_action_or_reset(),
and there should be no remove function.
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> +
>> + return 0;
This is equivalent of just
return error;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id sun4i_lradc_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-lradc-keys", .data =
>> &variant_sun4i_a10_lradc}, + { .compatible =
>> "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-lradc", .data = &variant_sun8i_a83t_r_lradc},
>> +
>
> {
>
>> /* sentinel */ }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun4i_lradc_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver sun4i_lradc_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "sun4i-lradc-hwmon",
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sun4i_lradc_of_match),
>> + },
>> + .probe = sun4i_lradc_probe,
>> + .remove = sun4i_lradc_remove,
>> + .resume = sun4i_lradc_resume,
Use .pm driver callback for suspend/resume.
>> + .suspend = sun4i_lradc_suspend,
>> +};
>> +
>> +module_platform_driver(sun4i_lradc_driver);
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Allwinner A13/A20 LRADC hwmon driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ruslan Zalata <rz@xxxxxxxxxxx>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
